A&E TV Is Justified In Their Decision

Well, that’s certainly a headline that is likely to ruffle some feathers with my conservative Christian friends. Unless you’ve been hidden under a rock this week, you are familiar with the decision that A&E television has made regarding Phil Robertson. After sharing his personal and biblical beliefs on homosexuality in a magazine interview, A&E made the decision to suspend Phil from the Duck Dynasty show indefinitely. The questions posed to Phil, the outrage over his answers, nor the decision of A&E should shock anyone. I’m certain Phil would tell you that shooting a duck sitting on the water is much easier than shooting one in flight. Well, the Robertson family have been sitting ducks for some time now. Eventually, someone would ask a question to test their commitment to their faith, and someone else would be offended by the answer causing them to ignite into a public temper tantrum – and therein lies the problem.

Leadership requires the ability to identify the real problem that needs to be solved. All too often, focus is placed on the symptoms of the problem, and therefore the problem isn’t solved. Using the “controversy” regarding Phil Robertson and A&E, let me point out how so many are focused on the symptoms and totally ignoring the real problem.

First Amendment
It’s currently impossible to navigate your way through Facebook or Twitter without encountering posts proclaiming the Phil’s first amendment rights are being violated. The outcry regarding first amendment rights are simply a symptom of the problem. The first amendment guarantees an American citizen the freedom to say whatever they like without the fear of persecution from the government. The government isn’t involved in this situation at all, thus this can’t be a first amendment issue.

GQ Set A Trap
Less vocal than the first amendment violation cries, but nonetheless being proclaimed loudly is the idea that GQ had no right to ask such controversial questions. Well, wait a minute, to suggest the first amendment protects Phil’s answer but not GQ’s questions is completely irrational.

A&E Folded
The vitriol started with gay rights activists against Phil, but it has swiftly shifted to Christians against A&E. Again, peruse Facebook and you will see calls to boycott A&E from dozens, even some of the biggest conservative names in the country. However, this is yet another symptom. A&E made a business decision that they are free to make in America. Furthermore, A&E should have the freedom to make such a business decision. The government legislating away a corporation’s ability to make business decisions will contribute to the death of the free market economy that we enjoy. No, you don’t have to agree with A&E’s decision, but you must acknowledge that A&E has the right to make such a decision.

Attack On Christianity
The situation with Phil Robertson and A&E has afforded fodder to feed the idea that Christians are being persecuted by the American media and liberal organizations. Let me make this clear, Christians in America have absolutely no clue what it is to be persecuted for their faith. I acknowledge that there exists a bias in the American media and those outside the Christian faith. That bias is based on a rejection of the Christian message and, again, just a symptom.

So you may ask, “what is the real problem?” America is currently plagued with the adolescent attitude that everyone must agree with me. America is currently plagued with adult individuals that have the thin skin of a kindergarten student on the playground and just can’t take the idea that someone could offend them. In the Phil Robertson situation, gay rights organizations became offended that Phil didn’t share their thoughts on homosexuality and actually said so. In the A&E situation, Christians are offended that A&E made a decision with which they disagree.

Gay rights organizations would be better served by civil discussion than by public outrage. Christians would be better served by getting out of the padded pews, opening your hearts to other sinners, and loving as Christ would than by boycotting a company abiding by their corporate rights.

By the way, I have a very personal relationship with Jesus Christ, and I happen to agree with Phil’s assessment of homosexuality as it is biblically accurate. However, I’m not offended at A&E’s decision, and I’d rather focus on the real problem rather than all these symptoms.

I would love to hear your thoughts on the Phil Robertson / A&E “controversy”. Do you see other true problems contributing to the situation? Share your comments below.

Date Night Ideas

Subscribe today and receive a copy of my date night ideas guide. This guide will jump start the date night commitment in your marriage relationship.

100 Date Night Ideas

Privacy Guarantee: I will never share your email address with anyone else. Powered by ConvertKit

Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

7 thoughts on “A&E TV Is Justified In Their Decision

  1. I fully agree with your assessment. People in this country do need to grow up and stop thinking it matters whether or not others agree with their personal choices. However, as a Christian, I cannot support A&E because they have known the Robertson family beliefs and values even before the show began. They were free to make whatever business decision that they deemed necessary, but personally, I think they shot themselves in the foot.

    • Thanks for you comments Yvonne. I don’t really think A&E made a very good decision, even from a business perspective. However, I do support their right to make such a decision.
      Thanks for reading,

  2. I agree with your assessment of this issue for the most part. It is not a matter of his first amendment rights. And Christians in America definitely do not know the pain of real persecution. However, Christians fearing to quote the Bible or share their religious views is an problem. A Christian being fired because he shared his religious views is wrong. Especially when the employer knew these personal beliefs to begin with. We live in a country where a company would be sued and boycotted for firing someone because they are homosexual, but it is their right to fire someone for saying that homosexuality is a sin. For me, this issue isn’t about homosexuality. It’s about not letting companies and the media bully Christians into being afraid of sharing their beliefs. And fear of losing your job is enough for a lot to keep hush about their spiritual beliefs. That is wrong. If we do not stand up for ourselves now, we leave the door open for real persecution. How long will it be before teaching your children that homosexuality is a sin, as the Bible says, becomes a crime? “Spreading hate” they will call it. We are allowing this company and the media to tell everyone that Phil Robertson was spreading hate. He was not spreading hate. Not once did he tell anyone they needed to hate homosexuals. He said he didn’t understand homosexuality and he said it was a sin, as the Bible teaches. He said the same thing that most straight men would say, “Why would you want to put “it” in “there” when you can put “it” where “it” was designed to go?” But because he used to proper names for our genitals he was somehow being vulgar. So when I say I support Phil, I mean that I support freedom to say what you believe without fear.

    • Thank you so much for your thoughtful comments Kylie. I don’t deny the need to protect,preserve, and defend all of the liberties we enjoy here in America – including the liberty that allows us to share our faith. However, I just wish the Christian community would spend an equal effort to reach out in a loving manner to those trapped by the sin of homosexuality (among other sins) as being exerted toward corporations.